core+gui+cli: anticipation/rebuild dates, preserve relative settings

Fixes around the delivery/build/check date handling (karen7 regtest):

- build_will (GUI + CLI) re-anchors date_to_check to the CURRENT heirs'
  earliest future delivery before building, so an anticipated rebuild is no
  longer blocked by the stale old-will anchor (NO_FUTURE_DATE). The checks of
  the existing will keep their anchored date_to_check.
- _sync_locktime_to_built_txs now PRESERVES RELATIVE locktime/threshold
  recipes ("2y"/"150d") in WILL_SETTINGS instead of freezing them to absolute
  timestamps: the anchored comparisons (resolve_locktime_against_tx and
  resolve_date_to_check with built_locktime) already prevent the daily
  invalidate prompt. Absolute values still sync on a genuine automatic
  anticipation.
- Will.remove_stale_wallet_history drops stale wallet-LOCAL will placeholders
  before every (re)build in GUI and CLI so their coins are available again.
- check_willexecutors_and_heirs raises HeirNotFoundException outside the
  count_heirs gate: a shortened relative recipe on a signed will now triggers
  a plain rebuild ("no heirs" only when there really are none).
- is_locktime_below_threshold compares the settings on one reference frame
  (resolve_guard_threshold), no longer against the built-will anchor.

Tests: purge unit + call-site, no-heirs, guard, anticipated-rebuild
end-to-end (GUI) + CLI mirror + fixed_percent_lists_amount unit,
relative-preserve sync; conftest restores electrum.constants.net after each
test (cross-file pollution guard).
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-10 17:07:22 -04:00
parent d5f30e89b9
commit 7c9bbfce58
16 changed files with 724 additions and 522 deletions

View File

@@ -1,379 +0,0 @@
# QML PLAN — BAL on Electrum QML / Android (Option B: minimal viable support)
> Goal: let Android users (Electrum QML GUI) use BAL. **The Android device is
> the OFFLINE SIGNING DEVICE**: its primary job is to receive unsigned will
> transactions from an online machine (desktop/another phone), sign them with
> the wallet keys held on it, and return the signed transactions — a classic
> air-gapped signer workflow. Online features (willexecutor contact,
> broadcast, build) are secondary on Android and belong mainly to the online
> machine.
> Strategy: a *third frontend* (`bal/gui/qml/`) that reuses `bal/core` logic
> through the existing GUI-free `BalController`, exactly like `bal/cli/`
> already does. The PyQt6 desktop GUI remains untouched and primary.
>
> Status: DRAFT for owner review (rule R4 — no code until explicit OK).
> Chat language: Italian; this document is in English per rule R1.
---
## 1. Verified facts (research done on the local checkouts)
All items below were verified by reading source, not assumed.
| # | Fact | Where |
|---|------|-------|
| F1 | The fork's Electrum ships a full QML GUI built on **PyQt6.QtQml** (PyQt6 6.11 installed in runtime env imports `QtQml`/`QtQuick` fine). | `electrum/electrum/gui/qml/` |
| F2 | The QML GUI has a **plugin mechanism**: manifest `"available_for"` must contain `"qml"`; Electrum then loads `<plugin>/qml.py` and calls the `init_qml(app)` hook. | `electrum/plugin.py` (`load_plugin_by_name`, gui_name), `gui/qml/__init__.py:88` |
| F3 | On load, `main.qml` reads `plugin.so.loader` and auto-creates the component from `<plugins>/<name>/qml/<loader>.qml`. The plugin itself sets `.so` (a `PluginQObject`). Canonical example: `electrum/plugins/labels/qml.py`. | `gui/qml/components/main.qml` (`onPluginLoaded`), `gui/common_qt/plugins.py` |
| F4 | The plugin must support **both** target versions: the QML GUI + `common_qt/plugins.py` exist in the 4.7.x line too (verified on the local 4.7.0 checkout). Exact 4.7.2 parity is Phase-0 task T1. | `/home/steal/devel/bal/electrum470/electrum/gui/{qml,common_qt}` |
| F5 | `BalController(plugin, wallet)` is GUI-free, per-wallet, and already implements state init + sign/build/broadcast flows against the bare `wallet` object (no `ElectrumWindow` needed). This is the reuse cornerstone of this plan. | `bal/cli/controller.py:119-175`, `sign_transactions` at :646 |
| F6 | In the repo, `bal` is already symlinked into the Electrum tree as an **internal** plugin: `electrum/electrum/plugins/bal -> ../../../bal-electrum-plugin/bal`. Internal plugins are plain files on disk → the QML engine can load `.qml` assets directly. | `ls -la electrum/electrum/plugins/` |
| F7 | The APK build spec lists packaged plugins explicitly and **BAL is not yet in that list**. | `electrum/contrib/android/buildozer_qml.spec:34-48` |
| F8 | The QML Preferences page has **hardcoded toggles only** for `labels` and `psbt_nostr`; there is no generic plugin manager UI. Plugin enabling works via config regardless (`plugins.bal.enabled = true`). | `gui/qml/components/Preferences.qml:168,186,511-512` |
| F9 | Extension points inside the QML app are minimal: `run_hook('init_qml', app)`, `run_hook('load_wallet', wallet)` (**one** argument, unlike Qt's two), `get_tx_extra_fee`, `tc_sign_wrapper`, and one named-component injection slot (`pluginsComponentsByName('export_tx_button')`). No tools menu, no status bar. | grep over `gui/qml/*.py`, `main.qml:778` |
| F10 | External ZIP plugins cannot serve `.qml` files from inside the zip (zipimport exposes Python modules only; `Qt.resolvedUrl` needs real disk paths). Distribution as internal plugin (F6) or runtime extraction avoids this. | consequence of F3 |
| F11 | Core signing path used by the CLI controller calls `wallet.sign_transaction(tx, password)` and updates signature counts — identical flow works under `QEWallet.wallet`. | `bal/cli/controller.py:646-700` |
---
## 2. Scope
### In scope (MVP)
Two usage **profiles** share one codebase:
- **Offline signer profile** (Android, PRIORITY): works with no network.
1. Import a will bundle exported by the online machine (existing JSON will
format, see F12) — via file share, paste, or QR.
2. Review what is being signed (destinations, amounts, locktimes, fees).
3. Sign internally (`wallet.sign_transaction` + password prompt).
Partial signatures are combined when the bundle is re-imported
(`combine_with_other_psbt`, already supported by `merge_will` logic).
4. Export the signed bundle back to the online machine.
- **Online manager profile** (desktop QML, secondary):
- Will status overview (state, expiry/check-alive date, reminder info).
- Heirs list (view/add/edit/remove, addresses or URIs).
- Will-executor selection (list, enable/disable, fee display, refresh).
- Build will (simplified wizard reusing core validation).
- Sign in place (password) or hand off to an offline signer via bundles.
- Broadcast / push to will-executors; invalidate will; check-alive refresh.
- Basic settings mapped onto `will_settings`.
The offline signer pages are built first and must function with the network
disabled (Electrum runs fine offline; willexecutor refresh simply degrades).
Also in scope:
- Android packaging: BAL bundled as internal plugin in the custom APK,
**enabled by default** (owner decision D3).
- Keep desktop (`qt`) and CLI (`cmdline`) behavior byte-for-byte unchanged.
### Out of scope (explicitly deferred)
- Full parity with the PyQt6 GUI (calendar widget, preview list editor,
advanced fee controls, themes).
- External-ZIP distribution of QML assets (F10 workaround postponed; ZIP
builds keep working for desktop exactly as today, without `qml` UI).
- iOS, upstream-Electrum (spesmilo) compatibility.
- Lightning-related features (irrelevant to BAL).
---
## 3. Architecture
```
┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ bal/core │
│ heirs, will, willexecutors, checkalive, │
│ reminders, input_rules, plugin_base │
└────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
│ (no Qt anywhere)
┌─────────────────────┼──────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
bal/gui/qt/ bal/cli/ bal/gui/qml/ ← NEW
BalWindow etc. BalController qml_plugin.py (BalQmlPlugin)
(~9.3k lines) (headless flows) models.py (QObject VMs)
so.py (PluginQObject)
*.qml (views)
wraps ONE BalController
per loaded wallet
```
Design rules:
- **Reuse, do not duplicate.** `bal/gui/qml/models.py` holds thin QObject
wrappers around one `BalController` instance per wallet. No business logic
in QML or in the wrappers beyond formatting.
- **Same persistence.** Wallet DB dicts (`heirs`, `will`, `will_settings`)
are registered by `bal/core/plugin_base.py` already; QML reads/writes them
through the controller, so a wallet moves between desktop/Android unchanged.
- **Threading.** Network operations (willexecutor fetch/push, broadcast)
run in worker threads exactly as the CLI does; results marshalled to the UI
thread via Qt signals on the wrapper objects. No blocking calls in slots.
- **One transfer format.** The airgap round trip reuses the existing JSON
will serialization (`WillItem.to_dict()` maps, exactly what the Qt GUI's
`export_json_file`/`import` + `merge_will` flow already produces and
consumes — see F12). No new format is invented; export/merge logic gets a
single shared home usable by both frontends.
- **Version gating.** Every import of `electrum.gui.qml.*` happens lazily and
defensively; if absent (e.g., odd build), the plugin degrades to core-only
behavior instead of crashing the daemon.
---
## 4. Work breakdown
### Phase 0 — Verification spikes (no product code)
| Task | Description | Exit criterion |
|------|-------------|----------------|
| T1 | Diff `gui/qml` + `gui/common_qt` between the 4.7.0 checkout here and current 4.8.x, focused on: `PluginQObject`, `init_qml` hook call sites, `onPluginLoaded` handler, `load_wallet` hook arity. If 4.7.2 differs, note shims needed. | Written compatibility note appended to COMPATIBILITY.md draft section |
| T2 | Run desktop QML GUI headless with BAL enabled via config: `QT_QPA_PLATFORM=offscreen run_electrum -g qml` with `plugins.bal.enabled=true`, manifest updated ad-hoc (throwaway branch). Confirms discovery/loading path end-to-end before writing any code. | Log shows `init_qml` called for bal; no crash |
| T3 | APK feasibility: add `electrum/plugins/bal` to `buildozer_qml.spec` package list locally, confirm p4a includes `.qml` data files and icons (may need `source.include_exts` adjustment). Do NOT ship. | Test APK contains `plugins/bal/qml/*.qml` |
| T4 | Decide entry-point UX given F9 (no menu hook): candidate = tiny patch in fork's `main.qml` adding a "BAL" item in the wallet drawer/menu that opens our window object from `app.pluginobjects['bal']`. Confirm with owner. | Decision recorded in this file |
Deliverable: short findings report appended to this document; go/no-go.
### Phase 1 — Skeleton integration
Files (all NEW unless noted):
```
bal/qml.py zipimport-style shim mirroring qt.py/cmdline.py
bal/gui/qml/__init__.py package docstring
bal/gui/qml/qml_plugin.py class BalQmlPlugin(BalPluginBase)
bal/gui/qml/so.py class BalSignalObject(PluginQObject)
bal/manifest.json MODIFIED: available_for += ["qml"]
```
Details:
- `qml_plugin.py`:
- `@hook init_qml(self, app)`: store app ref; create `so` parented to app;
for each already-loaded wallet call `_on_wallet_loaded(wallet)`
(mirrors labels' pattern, see F3).
- `@hook load_wallet(self, wallet)`**single argument** (F9); creates the
per-wallet view-model bundle (Phase 2) keyed by `wallet`.
- `@hook unload_wallet(self, wallet)`: drop controllers, close windows.
- `so.py`: `BalSignalObject(PluginQObject)` exposing:
- `loader` property returning `"BalMain.qml"` (drives F3 auto-create);
- signals: `walletChanged`, `willStateChanged`, `heirsChanged`,
`willexecutorsChanged`, `busyChanged`;
- slots called from QML: open/close window, refresh willexecutors,
check-alive now, build/sign/broadcast/invalidate commands.
- `manifest.json`: append `"qml"` to `available_for`. Desktop untouched
(Electrum filters per running GUI, verified F2).
Exit criterion: with `-g qml`, plugin loads, `so.loader` component is created
(log line from `onPluginLoaded`), no functional UI yet.
### Phase 2 — View-models (QObject layer)
New file `bal/gui/qml/models.py`:
- `BalQmlWallet(QObject)`: owns one `BalController`; exposes read-only
properties (`willState`, `dateToCheck`, `expired`, `reminderInfo`,
`sigsHave/sigsRequired` per tx) + notification signals; forwards actions to
controller methods (`build_will`, `sign_transactions`, `broadcast_will`,
`invalidate_will_headless`, `check_alive`... — names per controller).
- **Airgap methods (priority):** `export_will_bundle()` and
`import_will_bundle(json_text)` returning summary of what changed. These
are small ports of the Qt GUI's `export_json_file` (window.py:1605) and
`merge_will` (window.py:1620) semantics. Preferred implementation: move
the logic into shared helpers (controller level or `bal/core/will.py`
static functions) and make the Qt GUI call the same helpers, so the two
frontends cannot diverge; regression-covered by existing core tests plus
new round-trip tests.
- Offline profile detection: expose an `isOffline` property derived from
`wallet.network is None` / config, so QML can hide online-only pages.
- `HeirListModel(QAbstractListModel)`: roles `name`, `address`, `amountPct`,
`valid`; edit methods delegate to `Heirs` helpers through controller.
- `WillTxListModel(QAbstractListModel)`: roles `txid`, `status`, `fee`,
`sigsHave`, `sigsRequired`, `isComplete`.
- `WillExecutorListModel(QAbstractListModel)`: roles `url`, `selected`,
`fee`, `valid`; toggle + async refresh.
- `BalQrTransferModel(QObject)`: thin scheduler over the shared transfer
planner `bal.core.qrtransfer` (already battle-tested by the desktop Qt
plugin, P1-P4). Exposes `encode(items)` → frames, `frameAt(i)` (data URL /
pixmap for QML), `decode(text)` → tx list, `total`, `current`, presets;
re-emits a `frameChanged` notifier so the QML page can step 1..N. No QR
rendering inside the model (QML paints it).
- All list mutations happen on the controller state then `beginResetModel/
endResetModel` (datasets are small; simplicity over incremental updates).
Exit criterion: pytest-driven model tests pass offscreen (create models over a
regtest/testnet wallet fixture, assert roles after mutations).
### Phase 3 — QML views
New directory `bal/gui/qml/components/`:
```
BalMain.qml top-level Window; stack of pages below
BalSignPage.qml PRIORITY (offline signer): import bundle
(paste / file / QR), review summary of each tx,
password-sign, export signed bundle back
BalQrExportPage.qml QR export view: drives BalQrTransferModel, one
frame at a time (Prev/Next, progress i/N, chunk
preset selector), mirror of desktop Qt dialog
BalQrImportPage.qml QR import view: slot grid (1..N), camera via
Electrum `QRScan` reuse, manual paste fallback,
then jump into BalSignPage review/sign
BalStatusPage.qml will state, expiry countdown, check-alive button
(works offline with last-known data)
BalHeirsPage.qml ListView + add/edit dialog [online profile]
BalExecutorsPage.qml ListView with switches + refresh [online profile]
BalBuildPage.qml simplified build form (threshold selector, fees,
executor pick) → runs controller.build_will
[online profile]
BalSettingsPage.qml maps onto will_settings subset
controls/BalButton.qml, BalField.qml minimal styled primitives
qmldir module registration
```
Notes:
- **BalSignPage review screen is mandatory**: before signing, the user must
see per-transaction heir address, amount, locktime (date), and fee — this
device is the security boundary, so no "blind signing".
- QR transfer: a full will bundle may exceed one QR's capacity when there are
many heirs/transactions. The desktop Qt plugin now resolves this with
chunked multi-QR streams (`bal/core/qrtransfer.py`, chunk presets
150/400/900/1800 bytes/frame, EC level M); the QML GUI reuses the same
scheduler via a thin model. Order of preference stays (1) share/save file +
paste text; (2) chunked QR streams through `BalQrTransferModel`.
- Styling minimal, follow existing QML components' look (reuse
`controls/` from Electrum where importable — prefer copying tiny primitives
to avoid coupling to upstream churn; decide during implementation).
- Every string wrapped with `electrum.i18n._`.
Exit criterion: full manual walkthrough on desktop QML GUI (offscreen +
interactive) performing BOTH: (a) online profile — configure heirs → select
executors → build → sign → broadcast → invalidate; and (b) offline signer
profile — export unsigned bundle from an online wallet, import into a second
offline wallet instance, sign, re-export, import signed bundle back into the
first wallet and verify signatures combined/status COMPLETE. Walkthrough (b)
must pass with networking disabled.
### Phase 4 — Android integration
- Add `electrum/plugins/bal` (+ data extensions for `.qml`, `icons/*`) to
`contrib/android/buildozer_qml.spec` in the Electrum fork.
- Patch fork's `Preferences.qml` with a BAL toggle **(owner approved, D1)**
and default-enable BAL in the APK build (D3: enabled by default).
- Entry point per T4 decision (menu/drawer patch in fork's `main.qml`, D1
approved). Fallback if T4 picks auto-open: window opens on wallet load.
- Rebuild APK; smoke-test on device/emulator:
install → BAL already enabled → open wallet → full MVP walkthrough,
including airplane-mode signing round trip (file/QR transfer between an
online desktop and the offline device — for emulator testing, "offline" =
network disabled via settings).
- Watch-outs: filesystem paths (use `os.path.join`, no hardcoded separators —
already house style), background network on mobile (willexecutor timeouts),
APK size impact (bal is small; icons only), share-intent/file access
permissions for bundle import/export.
Exit criterion: signed test APK passes the same walkthrough as Phase 3.
### Phase 5 — Tests & CI hygiene
- New tests following repo conventions (`def test_*` + `__main__` block):
- `tests/test_qml_models.py` — models over fake/controller-backed wallet
(offscreen, no network).
- `tests/test_qml_airgap_roundtrip.py` — PRIORITY: export unsigned bundle
from wallet A → import into wallet B (same seed, offline) → sign →
export signed → merge back into A; assert COMPLETE status and signature
counts. Must pass with no network.
- `tests/test_qml_plugin_loading.py` — plugin instantiates under a stubbed
QML app object; `so` wiring correct; load/unload wallet lifecycle.
- Extend `tests/smoke_test.py` usage: `QT_QPA_PLATFORM=offscreen python3
tests/smoke_test.py electrum.plugins.bal` still green (qt path intact).
- Regression gate: full `tests/test_core_*.py` batch + ruff (no NEW
violations) before any delivery ZIP.
- Manual matrix recorded in CHANGELOG entry: [desktop qt, desktop qml
offscreen, Android APK] × [4.7.2, 4.8.0] where applicable.
### Phase 6 — Release plumbing & docs
- `build_zip.py`: ensure new `bal/gui/qml/**` and `components/*.qml` included
in deterministic zip (harmless on desktop; enables future extraction-based
loading).
- `COMPATIBILITY.md`, `README.md`, `HANDOFF.md`: document QML/Android status,
limitations, and how to enable (`-g qml` / APK toggle).
- `CHANGELOG.md`: numbered entry at END per house rules.
- Version bump + release handled by `make-release.sh` as usual (owner-driven).
---
## 5. Risks & mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| R1: 4.7.2 vs 4.8 QML internals drift | broken load on one version | Phase-0 T1 diff first; lazy imports + capability checks; shim module if needed |
| R2: no generic plugin UI in QML (F8) | users can't enable BAL from UI | config default-enable in fork APK; small Preferences.qml patch in fork (we control it); document manual config for desktop |
| R3: no natural entry point in main.qml (F9) | user can't find/open BAL window | T4 decision: fork-side menu/drawer patch; fallback = auto-open window on wallet load behind a setting |
| R4: dual-GUI maintenance burden | long-term cost | strict reuse of `BalController`; QML layer forbidden from business logic (review rule); parity features stay in qt GUI |
| R5: threading bugs on mobile networks | ANRs/crashes | all network ops in threads like CLI; signals-only UI updates; timeouts already configurable |
| R6: airgap transfer friction (bundle size vs QR capacity, share permissions on Android) | users cannot move bundles reliably | desktop Qt: chunked multi-QR streams + audio-modem optional channel shipped (P1-P4) and regression-gated; QML: file share + paste first, QR via `BalQrTransferModel` (Phase 2/3 notes); Android camera on Qt6 is known-flaky, file/paste stays the primary mobile fallback and is tested first in Phase 4 |
| R7: export/merge semantics divergence between frontends | signed bundles rejected or double-counted | single shared helper used by qt GUI and qml layer (Phase 2); round-trip regression test |
| R8: hidden coupling of qt code into shared modules | qml import pulls QtWidgets | lint guard idea: import-linter/ruff rule forbidding `PyQt6.QtWidgets` under `bal/gui/qml/` |
| R9: zip distribution ambiguity (F10) | confusion about what ships where | clear policy: ZIP = desktop qt+cmdline only; QML requires internal-plugin/APK route (Phase 6 documents this) |
| R10: unknown Android/Electrum baseline (owner to confirm, OQ4) | wrong Qt/PyQt6 assumptions in APK build | Phase-0 T3 builds against the fork's current toolchain; code keeps 4.7.x/4.8.x dual support so the answer can arrive late without rework |
---
## 6. Questions for the owner — ANSWERED (2026-08-25)
1. **Fork patches (T4/R3):** ✅ **D1 — APPROVED.** Patching the fork's
`main.qml`/`Preferences.qml` is allowed for the BAL menu entry and toggle.
2. **Offline signing topology:** ✅ **D2 — Android IS the offline device.**
The phone holds the keys and acts as air-gapped signer: import unsigned
bundle → review → sign → export signed bundle back to the online machine.
The sign/import/export page is therefore the top priority of Phase 3, and
the round-trip test is the top priority of Phase 5.
3. **Enable-by-default:** ✅ **D3 — BAL pre-enabled in the custom APK**
(toggle still available to disable).
4. **Target Android/Electrum baseline:** ⏳ **OPEN (OQ4)** — owner will get
back later. Not blocking: see risk R10 mitigation.
---
## 7. Effort estimate
| Phase | Rough size |
|-------|-----------|
| 0 spikes | ~half day (mostly reading + one throwaway branch) |
| 1 skeleton | ~300 lines Python |
| 2 models (incl. shared export/merge helpers) | ~600800 lines Python |
| 3 views (offline signer page first) | ~9001300 lines QML |
| 4 android | fork-side patches + build iteration (device-dependent) |
| 5 tests | ~500 lines |
| 6 release/docs | small |
Overall: comparable to a medium feature, dominated by Phase 3 UI polish and
Phase 4 device iteration.
---
## 8. Findings log (append-only)
- **F12** — The airgap round trip already exists in the Qt GUI layer and can
be ported almost verbatim: `export_json_file()` (window.py:1605) exports
all will items as `{wid: WillItem.to_dict()}` JSON (marking them
`EXPORTED`); the import side goes through `merge_will()`
(window.py:1620), which carries operational statuses, combines partial
signatures via `tx.combine_with_other_psbt()` when txids match, substitutes
the tx otherwise, and recomputes validity locally without network.
Conclusion: no new transfer format is needed; the plan is to give this
logic a shared home (controller/core) so Qt, CLI-adjacent tooling and QML
all use one implementation.
### Decisions
- **D1** — Fork-side patches to `main.qml` / `Preferences.qml` approved by
the owner.
- **D2** — Android = offline signing device; sign/import/export flow has
top priority.
- **D3** — BAL enabled by default in the custom APK.
- **OQ4** — Android/Electrum baseline: open, non-blocking (see R10).

View File

@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ from ..core.checkalive import (
CheckAliveError,
check_alive_expired,
resolve_date_to_check,
resolve_guard_threshold,
)
from ..core.heirs import Heirs, is_op_return_address
from ..core.plugin_base import BalConfig, BalPlugin
@@ -314,6 +315,28 @@ class BalController:
executor.
"""
will = {}
# Drop stale wallet-LOCAL will placeholders (mirror of the GUI
# build_will) so their coins are available to this build.
Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(
self.wallet, self.plugin.HISTORY_LABEL.get()
)
# A (re)build may have anticipated the delivery (shorter heir recipes)
# while ``date_to_check`` is still anchored to the OLD built will.
# Recompute it for the will being built (earliest future delivery among
# the CURRENT heirs), mirroring ``BalWindow.build_will``, so the
# anticipated dates pass the build filter.
_new_locktime = min(
(
Util.parse_locktime_string(h[2])
for h in self.heirs.values()
),
default=None,
)
if _new_locktime:
self.date_to_check = resolve_date_to_check(
self.plugin.is_basic_mode(), self.will_settings,
built_locktime=_new_locktime,
)
self.willexecutors = Willexecutors.get_willexecutors(
self.plugin, update=False, task=False
)
@@ -434,7 +457,13 @@ class BalController:
raise _user_facing(e) from e
locktime = Util.parse_locktime_string(self.will_settings["locktime"])
if locktime < date_to_check:
threshold_ts = resolve_guard_threshold(
self.plugin.is_basic_mode(), self.will_settings
)
if threshold_ts is not None:
if locktime < threshold_ts:
raise UserFacingException(_("locktime is lower than threshold"))
elif locktime < date_to_check:
raise UserFacingException(_("locktime is lower than threshold"))
if not self.no_willexecutor:

View File

@@ -96,6 +96,54 @@ def resolve_date_to_check(
return threshold.to_timestamp()
def resolve_guard_threshold(
is_basic_mode: bool,
will_settings: Any,
now: float | None = None,
) -> float | None:
"""Resolve the "locktime is lower than threshold" guard's reference.
The guard compares the stored settings on ONE reference frame: the
delivery (``locktime``, kept as at the call site) against this threshold.
Unlike :func:`resolve_date_to_check` -- which may be *anchored* to the
built will's frozen tx locktime so that an unchanged will never reads as
expired -- this helper resolves the threshold from the **stored settings
alone**. Otherwise, when the stored relative locktime is shorter than the
frozen locktime of an old (still valid) built will (e.g. the delivery was
shortened from ``"2y"`` to ``"1y"``), the guard would compare the fresh
"1y" locktime against the old will's anchored threshold and wrongly fire,
even though locktime > threshold by the settings themselves.
* BASIC mode: no threshold exists. Returns ``None`` and the caller falls
back to comparing the locktime against ``date_to_check`` (= now), so its
behaviour is unchanged.
* ADVANCED mode with an ABSOLUTE threshold: returns the stored threshold
as-is.
* ADVANCED mode with a RELATIVE threshold (``"30d"``/``"1y"``, meaning
"N days BEFORE the delivery"): the threshold is anchored to the locktime
resolved forward from *now* (the settings' own delivery reading, never a
built tx), keeping both sides of the comparison in the same reference
frame, as the settings widget displays it.
Returns ``None`` when there is no threshold to enforce (BASIC mode or a
missing stored value).
"""
if is_basic_mode:
return None
threshold_raw = will_settings.get("threshold")
if threshold_raw is None:
return None
threshold = BalTimestamp(threshold_raw)
if threshold.unit is None:
return threshold.to_timestamp()
now_dt = (
datetime.fromtimestamp(now, tz=timezone.utc) if now is not None else None
)
locktime_dt = BalTimestamp(will_settings["locktime"]).to_date(now_dt)
return threshold.to_date(locktime_dt, reverse=True).timestamp()
def check_alive_expired(
is_basic_mode: bool, date_to_check: float, now: float | None = None
) -> bool:

View File

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ The status flags themselves (the source of truth) stay here; only the mapping
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from electrum.address_synchronizer import TX_HEIGHT_FUTURE, TX_HEIGHT_LOCAL
from electrum.i18n import _
from electrum.logging import Logger, get_logger
from electrum.transaction import (
@@ -847,6 +848,48 @@ class Will:
except Exception as e:
_logger.error(f"save_valid_transactions_to_history failed: {e}")
@staticmethod
def remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, history_label):
"""Delete wallet-LOCAL will transactions saved under ``history_label``.
``save_valid_transactions_to_history`` stores the not-yet-signed
inheritance txs into the wallet's local history; those local
placeholders nominally spend the coins they reference. When the will is
REBUILT (prepare/build, auto-rebuild, on-close rebuild, CLI build) the
stale placeholders must be removed so the coins become available again
to the new build (see ``Util.get_available_utxos``). Only
wallet-local/future (non-broadcast) txs whose label matches the history
label template are removed; confirmed/broadcast history is never
touched. Returns the txids that were removed.
"""
if not wallet or not getattr(wallet, "adb", None):
return []
removed = []
for txid, label in Will._wallet_labels(wallet):
if not label or not Util._label_matches_history(label, history_label):
continue
try:
height = int(wallet.adb.get_tx_height(txid).height())
except Exception:
continue
if height not in (TX_HEIGHT_LOCAL, TX_HEIGHT_FUTURE):
continue
try:
wallet.adb.remove_transaction(txid)
removed.append(txid)
except Exception as e:
_logger.error(f"remove from history failed for {txid}: {e}")
continue
try:
wallet.set_label(txid, None)
except Exception as e:
_logger.error(f"set_label failed for {txid}: {e}")
try:
wallet.save_db()
except Exception as e:
_logger.error(f"save_db failed after history purge: {e}")
return removed
@staticmethod
def _add_transaction_to_history(wallet, tx, txid):
"""Store *tx* into the wallet's local history via ``adb``.

View File

@@ -1135,13 +1135,14 @@ class BalBuildWillDialog(BalDialog):
desired behaviour, and that the date shown in the panel/wizard must
reflect this anticipated date (so the calendar .ics also uses it).
RELATIVE dates are additionally normalised here: a relative value
("30d"/"1y") is re-parsed against "now" on every check, so it drifts
away from the fixed transaction locktime and the postpone check would
wrongly ask to invalidate the will every day. The stored locktime is
therefore frozen to the built transactions' absolute locktime, and a
relative threshold is frozen to its "N days before the delivery"
absolute value.
RELATIVE recipes ("30d"/"1y") are PRESERVED: they are resolved against
the built will's frozen locktime on every check (via
``Util.resolve_locktime_against_tx`` for the postpone detection and
``resolve_date_to_check(..., built_locktime=...)`` for the reference
timestamp), so they no longer drift away from the built transactions
and never trigger the daily invalidate prompt. Freezing them to an
absolute timestamp here would silently erase the user's relative
choice from WILL_SETTINGS.
We route the update through BalWindow.update_setting_widgets, which is
the single place that (1) stores the value in WILL_SETTINGS, (2)
@@ -1156,17 +1157,17 @@ class BalBuildWillDialog(BalDialog):
return
min_locktime = int(min_locktime)
stored_locktime = self.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"]
# A relative value ("30d"/"1y") is a MOVING TARGET: it is re-parsed
# against "now" on every check, so it drifts one day per day away from
# the fixed tx locktime and the postpone check would ALWAYS see a
# postpone -> the plugin asks to invalidate the will every day. It must
# therefore be normalised here to the frozen absolute locktime of the
# built transactions, even when it happens to parse to the same moment
# today. (Only an absolute stored value is comparable, see below.)
# A RELATIVE stored value ("30d"/"1y") is PRESERVED: it is resolved
# against the built transactions on every check (the post-build
# `resolve_date_to_check` anchoring and `resolve_locktime_against_tx`
# in the postpone detection), so it no longer drifts and must not be
# frozen to an absolute timestamp here. Only an ABSOLUTE stored value
# is compared with the built transactions (see below).
is_relative_locktime = (
isinstance(stored_locktime, str)
and stored_locktime[-1:].lower() in ("d", "y")
)
if not is_relative_locktime:
# Current stored delivery date, as a comparable UNIX timestamp.
try:
current = int(Util.parse_locktime_string(stored_locktime))
@@ -1174,54 +1175,28 @@ class BalBuildWillDialog(BalDialog):
# If the stored value cannot be parsed, fall back to syncing.
current = None
# A genuine user-chosen POSTPONE (a later absolute date) is never
# overwritten; anything else is synced to the built transactions.
# overwritten; a genuine automatic ANTICIPATION (built earlier
# than stored) is synced to the built transactions.
was_anticipation = current is not None and min_locktime < current
if not is_relative_locktime and current is not None and not was_anticipation:
pass
else:
if was_anticipation:
_logger.debug(
f"sync delivery date to built tx locktime: "
f"{current} -> {min_locktime}"
)
# Remember that we anticipated the date, so the later sign prompt can
# explain WHY signing is needed (see on_success_phase1). A pure
# relative->absolute normalisation is NOT an anticipation.
if was_anticipation:
# Remember that we anticipated the date, so the later sign
# prompt can explain WHY signing is needed
# (see on_success_phase1).
self._date_was_anticipated = True
# update_setting_widgets stores the value, persists it and refreshes
# the date widgets in all panels/wizard (the .ics calendar too).
# update_setting_widgets stores the value, persists it and
# refreshes the date widgets in all panels/wizard (the .ics
# calendar too).
self.bal_window.update_setting_widgets(
min_locktime, "locktime", update_all=True
)
# Same moving-target problem for a relative "Check Alive" threshold:
# it means "N days BEFORE the delivery" (the settings widget resolves it
# as real_threshold = locktime - N days), so it is normalised to that
# absolute date, referenced against the now-absolute stored locktime.
threshold_raw = self.bal_window.will_settings.get("threshold")
if (
isinstance(threshold_raw, str)
and threshold_raw[-1:].lower() in ("d", "y")
):
try:
locktime_ts = int(
Util.parse_locktime_string(
self.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"]
)
)
real_threshold = int(
BalTimestamp(threshold_raw)
.to_date(locktime_ts, reverse=True)
.timestamp()
)
except Exception as e:
_logger.error(f"sync threshold to absolute failed: {e}")
else:
_logger.debug(
f"sync threshold {threshold_raw} -> absolute {real_threshold}"
)
self.bal_window.update_setting_widgets(
real_threshold, "threshold", update_all=True
)
# A relative "Check Alive" threshold ("N days BEFORE the delivery") is
# also PRESERVED: it is anchored on every check by
# ``resolve_date_to_check`` / ``resolve_guard_threshold``, so it does
# not need to be frozen to an absolute date here.
def on_accept(self):
try:

View File

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ from ...core.checkalive import (
CheckAliveError,
check_alive_expired,
resolve_date_to_check,
resolve_guard_threshold,
)
from .common import (
OP_RETURN_PREFIX,
@@ -466,6 +467,31 @@ class BalWindow:
def build_will(self, ignore_duplicate=True, keep_original=True):
_logger.debug("building will...")
# Drop stale wallet-LOCAL will placeholders saved by previous prepares
# so their coins are available to this build (see remove_stale...).
Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(
self.window.wallet, self.bal_plugin.HISTORY_LABEL.get()
)
# A (re)build may have anticipated the delivery (shorter heir recipes)
# while ``date_to_check`` is still anchored to the OLD built will. Using
# that stale anchor as the build filter would block every future
# delivery ("NO_FUTURE_DATE"). Recompute ``date_to_check`` for the will
# that is being built: its locktime is the earliest future delivery
# among the CURRENT heirs. The checks of the EXISTING will keep their
# anchored ``date_to_check`` (set in init_class_variables).
_new_locktime = min(
(
Util.parse_locktime_string(h[2])
for h in self.heirs.values()
),
default=None,
)
if _new_locktime:
self.date_to_check = resolve_date_to_check(
self.bal_plugin.is_basic_mode(),
self.will_settings,
built_locktime=_new_locktime,
)
will = {}
# willtodelete = []
# willtoappend = {}
@@ -745,6 +771,27 @@ class BalWindow:
raise e
def is_locktime_below_threshold(self) -> bool:
"""True when the stored settings make the delivery earlier than the
Check Alive threshold (the "locktime is lower than threshold" guard).
Compares the delivery against the settings-derived threshold on the
SAME reference frame (see ``resolve_guard_threshold``), never against
the built-will-anchored ``date_to_check``: anchoring the guard to an
old, longer built will would wrongly fire right after the delivery was
shortened. The anchored reference still governs the validity and
expiry checks, which is where ``date_to_check`` belongs.
In BASIC mode there is no threshold, so the locktime is checked against
``date_to_check`` (= now) exactly as before.
"""
locktime = Util.parse_locktime_string(self.will_settings["locktime"])
threshold_ts = resolve_guard_threshold(
self.bal_plugin.is_basic_mode(), self.will_settings
)
if threshold_ts is not None:
return locktime < threshold_ts
return self.date_to_check is not None and locktime < self.date_to_check
def build_inheritance_transaction(self, ignore_duplicate=True, keep_original=True):
try:
_logger.info(
@@ -757,6 +804,11 @@ class BalWindow:
if not self.heirs:
_logger.warning("not heirs {}".format(self.heirs))
return
# Free the coins locked by stale wallet-LOCAL will placeholders
# BEFORE the amount/UTXO checks below (Step 1) see them.
Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(
self.window.wallet, self.bal_plugin.HISTORY_LABEL.get()
)
try:
self.init_class_variables()
Will.check_amounts(
@@ -791,8 +843,7 @@ class BalWindow:
)
)
return
locktime = Util.parse_locktime_string(self.will_settings["locktime"])
if locktime < self.date_to_check:
if self.is_locktime_below_threshold():
self.show_error(_("locktime is lower than threshold"))
return
if not self.no_willexecutor:

18
tests/conftest.py Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
"""Shared pytest fixtures.
Guards every test against cross-file network pollution: several karen7
regtest modules historically flipped ``electrum.constants.net`` to regtest at
import time, which broke unrelated offline tests (e.g. the CLI controller
suite) run in the same pytest process.
"""
import pytest
from electrum import constants
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def _restore_network():
"""Snapshot ``constants.net`` before each test and restore it after."""
prev = constants.net
yield
constants.net = prev

View File

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ import shutil
import sys
import tempfile
import time
import unittest.mock as mock
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), os.pardir))
@@ -25,6 +26,8 @@ from electrum.simple_config import SimpleConfig
from electrum.util import UserFacingException
from bal.cli.controller import BalController
from bal.core.heirs import Heirs
from bal.core.util import Util
VALID_ADDRESS = "bc1qusymuetsz2psaqzqxv8qmzcy64d9meckj3lxxf"
@@ -227,6 +230,39 @@ def test_auto_rebuild_threshold_passed_invalidates():
assert result["invalidation_tx"] == {"txid": None, "tx": None}
def test_build_will_reanchors_date_to_check_to_new_locktime():
"""CLI mirror of the GUI regression: ``build_will`` must re-anchor
``date_to_check`` to the CURRENT heirs' earliest delivery before building,
so an anticipated (shortened) rebuild is not blocked by the old built-will
anchor (which would yield NO_FUTURE_DATE in ``get_transactions``).
"""
with Plugin() as plugin:
plugin.USER_TYPE.set("advanced")
plugin.NO_WILLEXECUTOR.set(True)
plugin.ENABLE_MULTIVERSE.set(True)
plugin.WILL_SETTINGS.set({"threshold": "150d", "locktime": "2y", "baltx_fees": 20})
c = _make_controller(plugin)
c.no_willexecutor = True
c.heirs["alice"] = [VALID_ADDRESS, "100%", "1y"]
# Simulate an old built will frozen at 2y: reload keeps its (stale)
# anchor, which would reject the anticipated "1y" delivery.
c.init_class_variables()
stale_anchor = Util.parse_locktime_string("2y") - 150 * 86400
c.date_to_check = stale_anchor
assert Util.parse_locktime_string("1y") < c.date_to_check
with mock.patch.object(Heirs, "get_transactions", return_value={}) as gt:
result = c.build_will()
assert result == {}
# build_will re-anchored date_to_check to the new 1y delivery...
expected = Util.parse_locktime_string("1y") - 150 * 86400
assert abs(c.date_to_check - expected) < 3600
# ...and used THAT anchor as the build filter, not the stale 2y one.
assert gt.call_args.args[-1] == c.date_to_check
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# runner
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #

View File

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from bal.core.checkalive import ( # noqa: E402 (path insert above)
CheckAliveError,
check_alive_expired,
resolve_date_to_check,
resolve_guard_threshold,
)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
@@ -148,6 +149,76 @@ def test_advanced_mode_relative_locktime_without_built_tx_falls_back():
assert abs(result - expected) < 1
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# resolve_guard_threshold
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
def test_guard_threshold_basic_mode_returns_none():
fake_now = 1_800_000_000.0
threshold = resolve_guard_threshold(True, {"threshold": "30d"}, now=fake_now)
assert threshold is None
def _guard_locktime(settings, fake_now):
"""Reproduce the call-site locktime expression of the guard."""
from bal.core.plugin_base import BalTimestamp
return BalTimestamp(settings["locktime"]).to_timestamp(fake_now)
def test_guard_threshold_absolute():
fake_now = 1_800_000_000.0
locktime = fake_now + 90 * 86400
threshold = locktime - 30 * 86400
settings = {"locktime": locktime, "threshold": threshold}
assert resolve_guard_threshold(False, settings, now=fake_now) == threshold
def test_guard_threshold_relative_fresh_anchor():
"""A relative threshold must be anchored to the FRESH locktime so the
guard and the settings always share one reference frame.
Regression for the false positive where a still-valid built will frozen at
a LONGER delivery ("2y") anchored ``date_to_check`` beyond the currently
stored shorter delivery ("1y"): the old guard compared the fresh "1y"
locktime against that anchored threshold and wrongly fired "locktime is
lower than threshold", even though the settings themselves are consistent
(locktime is 30d AFTER the threshold).
"""
fake_now = 1_800_000_000.0
settings = {"locktime": "1y", "threshold": "30d"}
locktime = _guard_locktime(settings, fake_now)
threshold = resolve_guard_threshold(False, settings, now=fake_now)
assert threshold is not None
assert locktime > threshold # internally consistent: no fire
assert threshold > fake_now
# The helper takes no built anchor: a frozen "2y" built will must NOT
# contaminate the result, although resolve_date_to_check (the expiry
# reference) legitimately keeps using it.
frozen_two_years = locktime + 365 * 86400
anchored = resolve_date_to_check(
False, settings, now=fake_now, built_locktime=frozen_two_years
)
assert anchored > threshold # built anchor pushes date_to_check forward...
assert locktime < anchored # ...which is exactly what used to fire the bug
def test_guard_threshold_relative_locktime_absolute_threshold():
fake_now = 1_800_000_000.0
threshold = fake_now + 200 * 86400
settings = {"locktime": "1y", "threshold": threshold}
assert resolve_guard_threshold(False, settings, now=fake_now) == threshold
# "1y" from now is later than the stored absolute threshold: allowed.
locktime = _guard_locktime(settings, fake_now)
assert locktime > threshold
def test_guard_threshold_missing_returns_none():
fake_now = 1_800_000_000.0
assert resolve_guard_threshold(False, {"locktime": "1y"}, now=fake_now) is None
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# check_alive_expired
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #

View File

@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ from bal.core.heirs import (
is_op_return_address,
validate_op_return_hex,
)
from bal.core.util import Util
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# Constants
@@ -167,6 +168,32 @@ def test_heirs_amount_to_float():
assert heirs.amount_to_float("notanumber") == 0.0
def test_fixed_percent_lists_uses_build_anchor_for_relative_heirs():
"""A relative heir must survive the amount filter when the build anchor
(``from_locktime``) is recalculated for the anticipated delivery.
Before the fix, ``build_will`` kept ``date_to_check`` anchored to the OLD
(longer) built will; an "1y" heir resolved before that anchor was excluded
by the ``cmp <= 0`` filter and the build reported NO_FUTURE_DATE. With the
anchor recomputed for the new locktime (karen7: 2y -> 1y delivery) the
"1y" heir is kept.
"""
wallet = FakeWallet()
heirs = Heirs(wallet)
heirs["carol"] = ["addr1", "100%", "1y"]
# Stale anchor (old built 2y will still frozen): "1y" is in the past
# relative to it -> excluded from the amount calculation.
stale_anchor = Util.parse_locktime_string("2y") - 150 * 86400
_, _, percent_heirs, _, _ = heirs.fixed_percent_lists_amount(stale_anchor, 500)
assert "carol" not in percent_heirs
# Recalculated anchor for the new (1y) delivery: the heir is retained.
new_anchor = Util.parse_locktime_string("1y") - 150 * 86400
_, _, percent_heirs, _, _ = heirs.fixed_percent_lists_amount(new_anchor, 500)
assert "carol" in percent_heirs
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# Validation (static methods)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #

View File

@@ -13,8 +13,14 @@ import sys
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), os.pardir))
from bal.core.checkalive import resolve_date_to_check
from bal.core.util import copy_structure
from bal.core.will import Will, WillItem
from bal.core.will import (
HeirNotFoundException,
NoHeirsException,
Will,
WillItem,
)
# A valid serialized Bitcoin transaction hex (1 input + 1 P2PKH output, version 2)
_VALID_TX_HEX = (
@@ -210,6 +216,59 @@ def test_check_heir_added_triggers_rebuild():
assert raised, "adding an heir must raise HeirNotFoundException"
def test_shortened_relative_recipe_on_signed_rebuilds_not_noheirs():
"""Regression (karen7): heirs shortened "2y"->"1y" on a signed will whose
ADVANCED check window is anchored to the frozen built delivery must trigger
a plain rebuild (HeirNotFoundException), NOT "No Heirs".
Earlier the count gate resolved each current relative recipe from *now*
while ``check_date`` was anchored to the (longer) frozen built locktime, so
every heir fell below the window and was silently excluded -> NoHeirs even
though the will simply needs rebuilding on the new, shorter schedule."""
lt = 2_100_000_000 # a far-future frozen delivery (a "2y" build)
will_heirs = {"alice": ["addr_alice", 5000, "2y"]}
current_heirs = {"alice": ["addr_alice", 5000, "1y"]}
will = _make_will_with_heirs(will_heirs, lt)
will["willid_1"].set_status("COMPLETE", True)
check_date = resolve_date_to_check(
False, {"locktime": "2y", "threshold": "150d"}, built_locktime=lt
)
assert check_date < lt # the anchored window really precedes the delivery
raised = None
try:
Will.check_willexecutors_and_heirs(
will, copy_structure(current_heirs), {}, False, check_date, 100
)
except HeirNotFoundException:
raised = "rebuild"
except NoHeirsException:
raised = "noheirs"
assert raised == "rebuild", (
f"shortened recipe on a signed will must rebuild, got {raised!r}"
)
def test_all_heirs_past_check_date_still_noheirs():
"""The "no valid heirs" gate is preserved: when every heir is coherent with
the built will but its delivery lies before ``check_date``, the check still
reports NoHeirsException (there is literally nothing future to inherit)."""
lt = 1_900_000_000
will_heirs = {"alice": ["addr_alice", 5000, str(lt)]}
will = _make_will_with_heirs(will_heirs, lt)
raised = None
try:
Will.check_willexecutors_and_heirs(
will, copy_structure(will_heirs), {}, False, lt + 86400, 100
)
except HeirNotFoundException:
raised = "rebuild"
except NoHeirsException:
raised = "noheirs"
assert raised == "noheirs", (
f"a fully delivered will must report NoHeirs, got {raised!r}"
)
def test_needs_server_check():
"""Check button selection logic: only a VALID, PUSHED will with a
will-executor that is not yet CHECKED must be queried on the server.

View File

@@ -450,6 +450,12 @@ class FakeADB:
def remove_transaction(self, txid):
self.removed.append(txid)
# Simulate the real adb: dropping a stored tx frees the outputs it spent.
for utxos in self.outputs.values():
for utxo in utxos.values():
if getattr(utxo, "spent_txid", None) == txid:
utxo.spent_txid = None
utxo.spent_height = None
def get_spender(self, outpoint):
txid = self.spenders.get(outpoint)
@@ -837,6 +843,73 @@ def test_get_available_utxos_none_locktime_is_raw_view():
assert Util.get_available_utxos(None, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE, 1000) == []
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# Will.remove_stale_wallet_history (pre-build history purge)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
def test_remove_stale_wallet_history_frees_equal_locktime_spend():
# The stale placeholders (saved by a previous prepare) have the SAME
# locktime as the will being rebuilt, so get_available_utxos does NOT
# restore their coins (see test_...does_not_restore_not_later_locktime).
# The pre-build purge deletes them and the coins become available again.
wallet, utxo = _wallet_with_local_spend(locktime=1000)
spender = "ab" * 32
assert Util.get_available_utxos(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE, 1000) == []
removed = Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE)
assert removed == [spender]
assert wallet.adb.removed == [spender]
assert spender not in wallet.labels
assert [
u.prevout.to_str()
for u in Util.get_available_utxos(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE, 1000)
] == [utxo.prevout.to_str()]
def test_remove_stale_wallet_history_keeps_confirmed_spender():
# A broadcast (confirmed) BAL-labelled tx is never purged.
addr = "bcrt1qexample"
spender = "ab" * 32
utxo = _make_utxo(spent_txid=spender, spent_height=100)
wallet = FakeWallet(
stored_txs={spender: _make_multisig_ptx(0, locktime=2000)},
heights={spender: 100},
outputs={addr: {utxo.prevout.to_str(): utxo}},
addresses=[addr],
)
wallet.labels[spender] = _HISTORY_LABEL
removed = Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE)
assert removed == []
assert wallet.adb.removed == []
assert wallet.labels[spender] == _HISTORY_LABEL
def test_remove_stale_wallet_history_keeps_unlabeled_local_spender():
# Wallet-local BAL-status tx without a matching history label stays.
wallet, _ = _wallet_with_local_spend(locktime=1000)
spender = "ab" * 32
wallet.labels[spender] = "some other label"
removed = Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE)
assert removed == []
assert wallet.adb.removed == []
assert wallet.labels[spender] == "some other label"
def test_remove_stale_wallet_history_noop_without_wallet_or_adb():
assert Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(None, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE) == []
wallet = FakeWallet()
wallet.adb = None
assert Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE) == []
def test_remove_stale_wallet_history_never_raises():
adb = MagicMock()
adb.get_tx_height.side_effect = RuntimeError("boom")
wallet = MagicMock()
wallet.adb = adb
wallet.get_all_labels.return_value = {"ab" * 32: _HISTORY_LABEL}
assert Will.remove_stale_wallet_history(wallet, _HISTORY_TEMPLATE) == []
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# Main
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #

View File

@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ def test_rebuild_path_schedules_full_refresh():
win.date_to_check = 1_800_000_000
win.will_settings = {"baltx_fees": 1, "locktime": "1 month"}
win.bal_plugin = _CfgBag(
is_basic_mode=lambda: False,
MAX_WILLEXECUTOR_FEE=_Cfg(1),
SAVE_HISTORY=_Cfg(True),
HISTORY_LABEL=_Cfg("LBL"),
@@ -204,6 +205,46 @@ def test_rebuild_path_schedules_full_refresh():
schedule_mock.assert_called_once_with()
def test_rebuild_purges_stale_wallet_history_before_building():
# The rebuild path must drop stale wallet-LOCAL will placeholders (saved by
# an earlier prepare) so their coins are available to the new build.
win = object.__new__(BalWindow)
win.disable_plugin = False
win.heirs = {"h": object()}
win.willexecutors = {}
win.no_willexecutor = True
win.willitems = {}
win.will = {}
win.date_to_check = 1_800_000_000
win.will_settings = {"baltx_fees": 1, "locktime": "1 month"}
win.bal_plugin = _CfgBag(
is_basic_mode=lambda: False,
MAX_WILLEXECUTOR_FEE=_Cfg(1),
SAVE_HISTORY=_Cfg(True),
HISTORY_LABEL=_Cfg("LBL"),
)
win.window = _FakeWindow()
win.window.wallet = _Wallet()
with (
patch.object(Util, "get_available_utxos", return_value=[]),
patch.object(Util, "parse_locktime_string", return_value=1_800_000_001),
patch.object(Will, "get_min_locktime", return_value=0),
patch.object(Will, "check_amounts"),
patch.object(BalWindow, "init_class_variables"),
patch.object(BalWindow, "build_will"),
patch.object(
BalWindow,
"check_will",
side_effect=[NotCompleteWillException(), None],
),
patch.object(BalWindow, "update_all"),
patch.object(BalWindow, "_schedule_history_refresh"),
patch.object(Will, "remove_stale_wallet_history") as purge_mock,
):
BalWindow.build_inheritance_transaction(win)
purge_mock.assert_called_once_with(win.window.wallet, "LBL")
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# Main
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #

View File

@@ -390,6 +390,110 @@ def test_insufficient_funds_warns():
assert not ctl.willitems
def test_guard_not_blocked_by_old_built_will():
"""Regression: shortening the delivery in the STORED settings (relative
"1y"/"30d") while an old, still-VALID built will is frozen at a longer
locktime must NOT fire the "locktime is lower than threshold" guard.
The old guard compared the fresh settings locktime against ``date_to_check``
anchored to the built will (see ``resolve_date_to_check``), so a built-will
delivery longer than the settings' one made it fire even though the settings
are internally consistent (locktime is 30d AFTER the threshold). The guard
must instead compare the stored settings on a single reference frame
(``BalWindow.is_locktime_below_threshold``); ``date_to_check`` keeps its
built anchor for the expiry/validity checks.
"""
with _no_willexecutors():
ctl = make_controller()
ctl.bal_plugin.USER_TYPE.set("advanced") # ADVANCED Check-Alive mode
ctl.prepare_will()
txid, item = _single(ctl)
# Freeze the built (VALID) will at a delivery one year longer than the
# now-shortened settings: the pre-fix guard would reject the rebuild.
item.tx.locktime = item.tx.locktime + 365 * 86400
ctl.will_settings = {"locktime": "1y", "threshold": "30d"}
Util.fix_will_settings_tx_fees(ctl.will_settings)
ctl.init_class_variables()
# date_to_check is anchored to the built will (long delivery)...
assert ctl.date_to_check == item.tx.locktime - 30 * 86400
# ...and the OLD guard would have fired here:
old_locktime = Util.parse_locktime_string(ctl.will_settings["locktime"])
assert old_locktime < ctl.date_to_check
# but the settings themselves are consistent, so the guard must pass:
assert ctl.is_locktime_below_threshold() is False
assert not ctl.window.errors
def test_anticipated_rebuild_reanchors_date_to_check():
"""Regression (karen7): rebuilding a SIGNED will whose delivery was
anticipated (per-heir recipes shortened from 2y to 1y, ADVANCED mode) must
succeed.
``date_to_check`` stays anchored to the OLD built delivery for the validity
checks, but ``build_will`` must re-anchor it to the NEW (earliest current)
delivery as its build filter: before the fix the stale 2028 anchor rejected
every "1y" heir (cmp <= 0 in ``fixed_percent_lists_amount``) and the build
reported ``NO_FUTURE_DATE``. The old signed item is then superseded by
``search_rai`` (REPLACED -> no on-chain invalidation) and the rebuilt will
is coherent again.
"""
with _no_willexecutors():
ctl = make_controller()
ctl.bal_plugin.USER_TYPE.set("advanced")
# Per-heir deliveries require multiverse mode (the only way heirs can
# carry a different recipe than the settings locktime).
ctl.bal_plugin.ENABLE_MULTIVERSE.set(True)
ctl.will_settings = {"locktime": "2y", "threshold": "150d", "baltx_fees": 20}
Util.fix_will_settings_tx_fees(ctl.will_settings)
ctl.heirs["alice"][2] = "2y"
ctl.heirs["bob"][2] = "2y"
# Build and sign a 2y will (the old, committed delivery).
ctl.prepare_will()
old_txid, _old_item = _single(ctl)
old_locktime = _old_item.tx.locktime
signed = ctl.sign_transactions(None)
_old_item.tx = Will.get_tx_from_any(str(signed[old_txid]))
Will.check_signatures(ctl.willitems, ctl.wallet)
assert _old_item.get_status("COMPLETE")
# Anticipate: shorten every heir to 1y.
ctl.heirs["alice"][2] = "1y"
ctl.heirs["bob"][2] = "1y"
ctl.init_class_variables()
# date_to_check stays anchored to the OLD built delivery...
assert ctl.date_to_check == old_locktime - 150 * 86400
# ...and that stale anchor would reject the anticipated "1y" dates.
assert Util.parse_locktime_string("1y") < ctl.date_to_check
# The rebuild must succeed (re-anchored to the new delivery).
willitems = ctl.build_inheritance_transaction()
assert ctl.heirs.last_build_error is None, "NO_FUTURE_DATE must not fire"
new_valid = [
it for tid, it in willitems.items()
if tid != old_txid and it.get_status("VALID")
]
assert new_valid, "the anticipated (1y) will must build and stay VALID"
new_item = new_valid[0]
assert new_item.tx.locktime < old_locktime, "delivery must be anticipated"
# date_to_check was re-anchored to the rebuilt delivery (1y minus 150d).
assert abs(ctl.date_to_check - (new_item.tx.locktime - 150 * 86400)) < 3600
# The old signed item is kept but superseded (REPLACED -> not VALID).
assert _old_item.get_status("REPLACED") is True
assert _old_item.get_status("VALID") is False
# The rebuilt will is coherent (plain rebuild, no on-chain invalidation).
assert ctl.check_will() is True
assert not any("delivery date" in m for m in ctl.window.messages)
assert not ctl.window.errors
def _run_all():
tests = [fn for name, fn in sorted(globals().items()) if name.startswith("test_")]
for fn in tests:

View File

@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ The two gates that produced the prompt are covered here:
never read as EXPIRED because the check window drifts past the frozen
tx locktime.
The karen7 regtest wallet fixture (``tests/karen7``) reproduces the exact
reported state: heirs with ``"1y"``, a signed/pushed/checked item whose frozen
tx.locktime is 2027-08-05 (built 2026-08-05), and will_settings
The reported state (reproduced hermetically here — the original live wallet
dump ``tests/karen7`` is gitignored and regenerated as the wallet evolves) is:
heirs with ``"1y"``, a signed/pushed/checked item whose frozen tx.locktime is
2027-08-05 (built 2026-08-05), and will_settings
``{"locktime": "2y", "threshold": "150d"}``.
Run:
@@ -28,16 +29,14 @@ Run:
python3 tests/test_heir_relative_anchor.py
"""
import json
import os
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), os.pardir))
import pytest # noqa: E402 (path insert above)
from electrum import constants # noqa: E402 (path insert above)
constants.net = constants.BitcoinRegtest
from bal.core.checkalive import resolve_date_to_check # noqa: E402
from bal.core.util import copy_structure # noqa: E402
from bal.core.will import ( # noqa: E402
@@ -49,6 +48,16 @@ from bal.core.will import ( # noqa: E402
WillPostponedException,
)
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def _regtest_net():
"""Run these regtest-focused tests with BitcoinRegtest, restoring mainnet
afterwards so sibling test modules are unaffected by the net switch."""
constants.net = constants.BitcoinRegtest
yield
constants.net = constants.BitcoinMainnet
# A valid serialized tx (1 input + 1 output, version 2). Its nLockTime is 0;
# the tests override ``tx.locktime`` to simulate the frozen signed locktime.
_VALID_TX_HEX = (
@@ -158,55 +167,52 @@ def test_absolute_postpone_on_signed_still_detected():
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# karen7 wallet regression (real fixture)
# karen7 regression (hermetic, no live wallet fixture)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
def _load_karen7():
path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "karen7")
with open(path) as f:
return json.load(f)
# karen7's reported state, reproduced hermetically: heirs "1y", a signed item
# frozen at delivery 2027-08-05 (built 2026-08-05), will_settings with a
# relative "150d" delivery window and a "2y" promised locktime.
_WILL_SETTINGS = {"locktime": "2y", "threshold": "150d"}
def test_karen7_frozen_delivery_not_expired():
"""ADVANCED date_to_check anchored to the frozen tx locktime: the check
window opens BEFORE the delivery, so the will is never read as expired."""
data = _load_karen7()
will_settings = data["will_settings"]
valid_wid = "28b64bfd83878d15c668473aa695a2b9bc23196bc61ab3149e8f33241826978d"
wi = WillItem(data["will"][valid_wid], _id=valid_wid)
built_locktime = Will.get_min_locktime({valid_wid: wi})
heirs = {"alice": ["addr_alice", 5000, "1y"]}
item = _make_will_item(copy_structure(heirs), _FROZEN, status_complete=True)
will = {"willid_1": item}
built_locktime = Will.get_min_locktime(will)
assert built_locktime is not None
assert built_locktime == int(wi.tx.locktime)
assert built_locktime == int(item.tx.locktime)
date_to_check = resolve_date_to_check(
False, will_settings, now=1_800_000_000.0, built_locktime=built_locktime
False, _WILL_SETTINGS, now=1_800_000_000.0, built_locktime=built_locktime
)
assert int(date_to_check) < built_locktime
# Re-evaluated 10 days later the window is identical (no daily drift).
later = resolve_date_to_check(
False, will_settings, now=1_800_000_000.0 + 10 * 86400,
False, _WILL_SETTINGS, now=1_800_000_000.0 + 10 * 86400,
built_locktime=built_locktime,
)
assert date_to_check == later
def test_karen7_unchanged_heirs_are_coherent():
"""The karen7 heirs (unchanged relative "2d") are coherent with the frozen
signed tx: the plugin must NOT ask to invalidate the will."""
data = _load_karen7()
valid_wid = "28b64bfd83878d15c668473aa695a2b9bc23196bc61ab3149e8f33241826978d"
"""Unchanged relative "1y" heirs are coherent with the frozen signed tx:
the plugin must NOT ask to invalidate the will."""
heirs = {"alice": ["addr_alice", 5000, "1y"]}
# Use _FROZEN (a UTC-midnight value) so the check is compatible with
# the UTC anchoring code.
frozen_locktime = _FROZEN
date_to_check = resolve_date_to_check(
False, data["will_settings"],
False, _WILL_SETTINGS,
now=1_800_000_000.0,
built_locktime=frozen_locktime,
)
outcome = _run_heir_check(
data["will"][valid_wid]["heirs"],
data["heirs"],
copy_structure(heirs),
copy_structure(heirs),
frozen_locktime,
status_complete=True,
)
@@ -219,6 +225,7 @@ def test_karen7_unchanged_heirs_are_coherent():
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
if __name__ == "__main__":
constants.net = constants.BitcoinRegtest
for name in sorted(dir()):
if name.startswith("test_"):
globals()[name]()

View File

@@ -2,13 +2,17 @@
Tests for ``BalBuildWillDialog._sync_locktime_to_built_txs``.
This is the post-build sync that keeps the plugin's stored delivery date
(WILL_SETTINGS["locktime"]) and check-alive threshold in lockstep with the
BUILT transactions' fixed locktime. The bug it fixes (reported by the owner):
(WILL_SETTINGS["locktime"]) in lockstep with the BUILT transactions' fixed
locktime when the core AUTOMATICALLY anticipates it (one day earlier than
stored).
ADVANCED mode + RELATIVE locktime ("90d") / threshold ("30d") -> the plugin
asks to invalidate the will EVERY DAY. The relative value is re-parsed
against "now" on every check, so it drifts one day per day away from the
fixed tx locktime and the postpone check always sees a "postpone".
RELATIVE recipes ("90d" / "1y") are now PRESERVED: the daily-drift problem
that once forced freezing them to absolute timestamps is solved at the root by
anchoring every relative recipe against the built transactions
(``Util.resolve_locktime_against_tx`` for the postpone detection,
``resolve_date_to_check(..., built_locktime=...)`` for the reference
timestamp). Only a genuine automatic anticipation on an ABSOLUTE stored date
moves the stored value.
The method is exercised with a lightweight fake ``self`` (no Qt event loop, no
Electrum wallet) by calling it as an unbound method.
@@ -24,7 +28,6 @@ from types import SimpleNamespace
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), os.pardir))
from bal.core.plugin_base import BalTimestamp # noqa: E402 (path insert above)
from bal.gui.qt.dialogs import BalBuildWillDialog # noqa: E402 (path insert above)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
@@ -68,34 +71,30 @@ def _call_sync(will_settings, tx_locktimes, recorded):
# Tests
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
def test_relative_locktime_normalized_to_absolute():
"""The reported bug: a relative stored locktime is frozen to the absolute
value of the built transaction, even when it parses to the same moment."""
def test_relative_locktime_preserved():
"""A RELATIVE stored locktime ("90d"/"1y") is PRESERVED after a rebuild:
it is anchored against the built transactions on every check, so it must
not be frozen to an absolute timestamp in WILL_SETTINGS."""
tx_locktime = 1_800_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
{"locktime": "90d", "threshold": "30d"}, [tx_locktime], recorded
)
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"] == tx_locktime
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"] != "90d"
# A pure relative->absolute normalisation is NOT an anticipation: the sign
# prompt must not claim the date was anticipated.
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"] == "90d"
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["threshold"] == "30d"
assert recorded == [], "a relative recipe must never be rewritten"
assert fake._date_was_anticipated is False
def test_relative_threshold_frozen_to_absolute():
"""A relative threshold ("N days BEFORE the delivery") is normalised to the
same absolute value the settings widget computes (real_threshold)."""
def test_relative_threshold_preserved():
"""Same for the relative "Check Alive" threshold: it stays relative."""
tx_locktime = 1_800_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
{"locktime": "90d", "threshold": "30d"}, [tx_locktime], recorded
)
expected = int(
BalTimestamp("30d").to_date(tx_locktime, reverse=True).timestamp()
)
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["threshold"] == expected
assert ("threshold", expected, True) in recorded
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["threshold"] == "30d"
assert recorded == []
def test_absolute_locktime_unchanged_on_equal():
@@ -113,8 +112,8 @@ def test_absolute_locktime_unchanged_on_equal():
def test_anticipation_sets_flag_and_moves_earlier():
"""A real anticipation (built locktime earlier than the stored absolute
one) still moves the date earlier and flags the sign prompt."""
"""A real automatic anticipation of an ABSOLUTE stored date (built earlier
than stored) still moves the date earlier and flags the sign prompt."""
tx_locktime = 1_700_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ def test_anticipation_sets_flag_and_moves_earlier():
def test_stored_earlier_than_built_never_moved_later():
"""A stored absolute date that is already EARLIER than the built txs (the
user moved the delivery later) is never pulled back up on rebuild: only
anticipation (built < stored) and relative normalisation move the value."""
anticipation (built < stored) moves the value."""
stored = 1_800_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
@@ -142,39 +141,39 @@ def test_stored_earlier_than_built_never_moved_later():
def test_multiple_txs_uses_minimum_locktime():
"""When several transactions carry different locktimes, the minimum is used
(owner-confirmed behaviour for the delivery date shown in the UI)."""
"""When several ABSOLUTE transactions carry different locktimes, the minimum
is used for a genuine automatic anticipation (owner-confirmed behaviour for
the delivery date shown in the UI)."""
min_locktime = 1_750_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
{"locktime": "90d", "threshold": "30d"},
{"locktime": 1_800_000_000, "threshold": 1_600_000_000},
[min_locktime, min_locktime + 86_400],
recorded,
)
assert fake.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"] == min_locktime
def test_relative_locktime_stops_daily_postpone():
"""End-to-end guard for the reported bug: after the sync, re-parsing the
stored (now absolute) locktime on later days always equals the built
tx locktime, so the postpone check never fires again."""
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
def test_relative_locktime_stays_coherent_via_anchor():
"""Daily-drift guard: an UNCHANGED relative recipe is resolved against the
tx build moment (``Util.resolve_locktime_against_tx``), so even WITHOUT
being frozen to an absolute value it still reads as COHERENT (== tx
locktime) on later days - the postpone check never fires again."""
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
from bal.core.util import Util
tx_locktime = 1_800_000_000
recorded = []
fake = _call_sync(
{"locktime": "90d", "threshold": "30d"}, [tx_locktime], recorded
)
stored = fake.bal_window.will_settings["locktime"]
# resolve_locktime_against_tx normalises to UTC midnight before anchoring,
# so use a midnight-UTC frozen tx locktime (the timestamp the engine itself
# stores after building).
tx_locktime = int(datetime(2027, 1, 15, tzinfo=timezone.utc).timestamp())
built = "90d" # recipe frozen at build time
current = "90d" # unchanged recipe today
for _day in range(0, 7):
# Simulate the check on later days: parse the STORED value (which is
# now the absolute tx locktime) and compare with the fixed tx locktime.
new_locktime = Util.parse_locktime_string(stored)
assert new_locktime == tx_locktime
assert new_locktime <= tx_locktime # no POSTPONE / drift
# Sanity: a RELATIVE value would have drifted past it (the bug).
resolved = Util.resolve_locktime_against_tx(current, built, tx_locktime)
assert resolved == tx_locktime # no POSTPONE / drift
# Sanity: a naive forward-from-now re-parse would have drifted past it
# (the bug the anchor fixes).
drifted = int(
(
datetime.fromtimestamp(tx_locktime) + timedelta(days=1)