Fix link text: correct article title, not a nickname

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-12 11:16:17 +02:00
parent 8c3df1516a
commit 0a19fb9d8f

View File

@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ footer .built{font-size:13px;color:var(--muted);margin-top:8px}
<li><strong>No single server can be attacked into failing the user.</strong> The Will-Executor network is decentralized, redundant, and incentivized by on-chain fees. Kill a server; another one takes over.</li> <li><strong>No single server can be attacked into failing the user.</strong> The Will-Executor network is decentralized, redundant, and incentivized by on-chain fees. Kill a server; another one takes over.</li>
<li><strong>No novel cryptography is on the critical path.</strong> The security of your inheritance comes from Bitcoin signatures and nLockTime — primitives that have survived a decade and a half of adversarial review. No custom scripts to be broken by an unknown class of attack.</li> <li><strong>No novel cryptography is on the critical path.</strong> The security of your inheritance comes from Bitcoin signatures and nLockTime — primitives that have survived a decade and a half of adversarial review. No custom scripts to be broken by an unknown class of attack.</li>
<li><strong>No secret code to reverse-engineer.</strong> The plugin and the executor are open source, MIT-licensed, and small enough to be audited by a serious reader — human or AI.</li> <li><strong>No secret code to reverse-engineer.</strong> The plugin and the executor are open source, MIT-licensed, and small enough to be audited by a serious reader — human or AI.</li>
<li><strong>AI cuts both ways, and we welcome it.</strong> As we wrote in our <a href="https://bitcoin-after.life/blog/it-all-starts-with-the-seed.html">Forty Minutes essay</a>, the Coldcard seed flaw was likely found by an AI reading old public code. That capability is now in every user's hands: you can hand our code to a capable model tomorrow and ask, in plain English, <em>where can this break?</em> An inheritance protocol should welcome that scrutiny, not fear it. Ours does.</li> <li><strong>AI cuts both ways, and we welcome it.</strong> As we wrote in <a href="https://bitcoin-after.life/blog/it-all-starts-with-the-seed.html">"It all starts with the seed"</a>, the Coldcard seed flaw was likely found by an AI reading old public code. That capability is now in every user's hands: you can hand our code to a capable model tomorrow and ask, in plain English, <em>where can this break?</em> An inheritance protocol should welcome that scrutiny, not fear it. Ours does.</li>
<li><strong>The plan renews itself.</strong> BAL is designed for periodic refresh every two to three years, so lessons like Liquid's are absorbed before they become tomorrow's crisis.</li> <li><strong>The plan renews itself.</strong> BAL is designed for periodic refresh every two to three years, so lessons like Liquid's are absorbed before they become tomorrow's crisis.</li>
</ul> </ul>
<blockquote><p>The Liquid hack did not shake our design. It reinforced it. Every place BAL <em>could</em> have added a shortcut — a sidechain for cheaper fees, a new script for cleverer conditions, a proprietary wallet for a nicer UX — is a place where, in 2026, someone else lost $320 million.</p></blockquote> <blockquote><p>The Liquid hack did not shake our design. It reinforced it. Every place BAL <em>could</em> have added a shortcut — a sidechain for cheaper fees, a new script for cleverer conditions, a proprietary wallet for a nicer UX — is a place where, in 2026, someone else lost $320 million.</p></blockquote>